In favor of falling out with friends

I’ve let so many of mine go — and I don’t miss any of them

Pexels.com

Since I’m so old — sixty-four this summer — Facebook has always been my preferred form of social media. But if I was a softer soul there’s a feature on it that might really tug at my heartstrings: “See your memories.” Because many of mine — going back more than a decade — are now blank of any actual memory: “Content not available.”

I know what these were: photographs of me with ex-friends (they’d always take the selfies, as I don’t have a camera-phone) whom I’ve fallen out with and who have since deleted the photographs….

Since I’m so old — sixty-four this summer — Facebook has always been my preferred form of social media. But if I was a softer soul there’s a feature on it that might really tug at my heartstrings: “See your memories.” Because many of mine — going back more than a decade — are now blank of any actual memory: “Content not available.”

I know what these were: photographs of me with ex-friends (they’d always take the selfies, as I don’t have a camera-phone) whom I’ve fallen out with and who have since deleted the photographs. In 90 percent of cases, I’d say that I was the one who caused the falling-out. 

If I’m being honest, I don’t miss any of them. (Tell a lie: one of them had a disabled badge, meaning that we could park the car I bought her anywhere we liked — right outside restaurants, mostly. I felt like Princess Margaret!) But recently, being the grand old age I am, some of these friends I squabbled with have started dying. It’s a strange feeling to check someone’s Facebook page when you haven’t thought of them in years only to find dozens of sad tributes to them. Although so far it’s been nobody I was particularly close to, it has made me wonder how I’ll feel when people I was once truly good friends with die.

Agony aunts always advise young marrieds not to let the sun go down on an argument — so wouldn’t that be even truer of old friends not letting the final curtain go down on a contretemps? Am I going to feel bad that I didn’t try to make it up with them? Or am I going to think: “That was a lucky escape; X was tighter than two coats of nail polish, so it’s unlikely that they’ll have put any cash behind the bar for post-funeral refreshments — muggins here would have been buying the drinks all night!”

I’ve been thinking about my checkered friendship history recently due to the publication of Elizabeth Day’s book Friendaholic: Confessions of a Friendship Addict. I’ve never been addicted to friendship — I’m more of a binge-drinker. I don’t need friends at all — but I really enjoy them and when I do it, I go big. Because I’ve been married to various men since I was a teenager, I never did the apartment-sharing thing that lots of girls do, which perhaps led me to idealize my mates in the first flush of friendship — they always seemed to me the most amusing and attractive of women, and I never failed to be surprised when they didn’t wow my single male friends in a similar way. “You’ve got to stop telling people that X looks like Winona Ryder and Y looks like Kim Basinger,” a husband once chided me. “They don’t, and then everyone’s disappointed.” But they do look that beautiful to me — at first.

An only child with a head full of dreams and a map of the London Tube above my bed, I imagined escaping my happy home from an early age. I wanted to be a great writer, which I figured probably meant being a bad person; this didn’t make me the best at getting on with little girls, even though I was a little girl myself, so I used to hide in my room and beg my mother to make potential friends go away when they came to call for me. I was happier reading — Dorothy Parker and Oscar Wilde were my people, not those I’d been set among by some accident of birth. It wasn’t until I ran off with my second husband that I finally found my tribe and understood that the thrill of running with a fast crowd was almost as good as being alone. It was the 1980s and there was nowhere better to be than London — especially if you were a cute young journalist. The money! The clubs! The cocaine! Even St. Paul of Thebes would have found it hard to be a hermit.

On moving to Brighton in 1995 — a notorious party town where everyone was friendly — I saw no reason to change my ways. I picked up New Best Friends the way a cashmere jumper picks up lint — all I required was that they had a similar capacity for excess. I never bothered culling in those far-off, pre-plague days; in my seven-bedroomed party house with the swimming pool at the end of the orchard, I could move from group to group and never get bored.

Eventually came lockdown, and I rediscovered the joys of my own company. It was like being a girl again, when reading was an escape. But once we were allowed to see people, I found I couldn’t tolerate dull company any more. Though I never went as far as someone I knew who would regularly weep due to the anticipation of boredom before they went to lunch with their friends, I found myself merry when circumstances caused cancellation. (You’ll never hear me saying a bad word about the striking railway workers.)

Researchers say the optimum number of close friends is five; any more and the benefits to mental health decline, with having more than seven even being linked to depression. So it’s quite sensible to have regular culls. Sometimes I can get rid of loads at once — being a bad loser over Brexit will easily earn you the Order of the Boot. But I’m aware that differing political viewpoints are often a convenient and high-minded alibi for bringing an end to a friendship where the thrill has gone.

One friend was so self-obsessed I dubbed her the Queen of Me-ba and would take bets with mutual mates that we could find a topic which she couldn’t bring back to herself; it never happened, not even with emus or the sinking of the Belgrano. Another was, I realized, a terrible snob when she never even acknowledged a new friend with a menial job who I brought along to lunch, having slobbered over all the media and arty ones I’d brought before. Recently, Dolly Alderton gave advice to a reader of the Times who wrote to say their best friend was giving them “the ick”: “What is true of any relationship is that the irritation we feel is in direct relation to our respect for each other. If we lose faith in the fundamental make-up of someone we love, we lose any tolerance for their bad habits on the surface.”

I do agree with that great Peter Ustinov quote: “I do not believe that friends are necessarily the people you like best, they are merely the people who got there first.” You need to be flexible in case a potential new one comes along; as Marie Kondo asks of household objects, does this spark joy? If it does, shunt an old one along and go for it.

In turn, I’ve been dumped by a couple of friends I would rather have kept; it stings for a bit, but I’m not twelve, so I got over it. And I can count them on one hand — whereas those I’ve “let go” would be in three figures. The best thing is when you both go off each other at the same time — no muss, no fuss. I remember one girl I would have crossed continents to be with; last winter, following much mutual fussing and squealing in anticipation of meeting up after more than a year, she finally made it to Brighton. When I looked out of the window that morning and saw the rain, I didn’t want to go out to lunch and be entertaining; I wanted to stay in on my chaise longue by the fire and write. I sat at my computer trying to find the perfect excuse — and as I pinged my fork-tongued alibi to her, she did the same to me. It was a lovely moment, recalling the perfect harmony of our first summer as friends.

“You’ll end up alone!” I hear. But I haven’t — and I’m basically an OAP, so when’s it going to happen? Because I don’t cohabit with my husband, we meet in bars and restaurants, as friends do; it’s easy to get into a rut with someone you’ve been with for a quarter of a century, but we are fortunate enough not to have to worry about domestic routine. But even more than this, I’ve got myself. I love being alone — the company is always scintillating — so the warnings of future loneliness don’t really land.

So back to Facebook and those wiped memories. “You’re all caught up,” the site helpfully informs me at the end of a blank page — is it being cheeky? Because I’m not caught up — not pining for friendships that are better left in their shallow grave than brought back to a half-life, like the grim revenant cat in Pet Sematary. Yes, I may feel bad if they go first — but none of us knows the moment of our death, and what if I went before them? Then I’d have made up with a legion of people I was relieved to unload for no reason at all; all the freeloaders, buzz-kills and, worst of all, mediocre writers whose stuff I pretended to like! And if I do kick the bucket first, I’d like to think of them — all of them born bit-players — sitting around slating me. I may be a hard-hearted Hannah, but at least I won’t waste a minute of my lovely life having dreary duty-lunches with a friend I should have parted from a long time ago — for both our sakes.

This article was originally published in The Spectator’s UK magazine. Subscribe to the World edition here.

Comments
Share
Text
Text Size
Small
Medium
Large
Line Spacing
Small
Normal
Large